The Psychopath Wars: Soldiers of the Future?

4 Comments
Join the Conversation
Legions of Psychopaths - Xenia
Legions of Psychopaths - Xenia
Psychopaths are ideal exemplary material for the futuristic soldier - troops in possession of their mental faculties without the burden of emotion.

According to Dr. Richard A. Gabriel in his fascinating book, No More Heroes, the sociopathic personality can keep his or her psyche intact even under extremely pathological conditions, while the sane will eventually break down under guilt, fear, or normal human repulsion.

Chemical Soldiers

Richard A. Gabriel (military historian, retired U.S. army officer and former professor at the U.S. Army War College) describes socio/psychopaths as people without conscience, intellectually aware of what harm they might do to another living being, but unable to experience corresponding emotions.

This realization, Gabriel claims, has led the military establishments of the world to discover a drug banishing fear and emotion in the soldier by controlling his brain chemistry. In order for soldiers to ideally function in modern war he should first be reconstructed to become what could be defined as mentally ill.

“We may be rushing headlong into a long, dark chemical night from which there will be no return,” warns Gabriel.

If these efforts succeed (as it appears they can) a chemically induced zombie would be born, a psychopathic-type being who would function (at least temporarily) without any human compassion and whose moral conscience would not exist to take responsibility for his actions.

“Man’s nature would be altered forever,” he adds, “and it would cost him his soul.”

As incredible and futuristic as that sounds, the creation of such a drug is apparently already well underway in the world’s military research labs; Gabriel reports such research centers already exist in the United States, Russia, and Israel.

Since all emotions are based in anxiety, it appears the eradication of it (perhaps through a variant of the anti-anxiety medication Busbirone) may create soldiers who become more efficient killing machines.

Futuristic Warfare

Gabriel writes further about the possible nightmarish future of modern warfare:

“The standards of normal sane men will be eroded, and soldiers will no longer die for anything understandable or meaningful in human terms. They will simply die, and even their own comrades will be incapable of mourning their deaths […] The battlefields of the future will witness a clash of truly ignorant armies, armies ignorant of their own emotions and even of the reasons for which they fight.” (Operation Enduring Valor, Richard A. Gabriel)

This would strip a person of his core identity and all of his humanity. Whether or not the soldier would knowingly take part in this experience is unknown, but during the 1991 Persian Gulf War, one could almost easily imagine that this conscience-killing pill had already been swallowed.

Psychopathic Behavior During War

During the 1991 Iraq war a pilot interviewed on European television callously remarked ambushing Iraqis was “like waiting for the cockroaches to come out so we could kill them." Other U.S. pilots compared killing human beings to “shooting turkey” or like “attacking a farm after someone had opened a sheep stall.”

This same lack of empathy can be seen in Iraq’s Abu Graib prison scandal (2004) where U.S. soldiers were shown seemingly to enjoy torture, as well as more recent photos of military men posing with dead Afghans (first published in Germany's Der Spiegel magazine); more gruesome photos were later published in Rolling Stone before the U.S. Army censored all the remaining damning material from public view.

No More Heroes warns that modern warfare will become increasingly difficult for sane men to endure. The combat punch of man’s weapons has increased over 600% since World War II. These weapons are highly technical. High Explosive Plastic Tracers (HEP-T) send fragments of metal through enemy tanks and into humans at speeds faster than the speed of sound. The Starlight Scope is able to differentiate between males and females by computing differences in body heat given off by pelvic areas. The Beehive artillery ammunition (filled with three-inch long nail-like steel needles) is capable of pinning victims to trees. The world has a nightmare arsenal of terrible weapons advanced beyond the evolution of our morality.

According to renowned psychologist, Robert Hare, one out of every twenty-five persons is a psychopath (most are undetected by society). Many of these unnoticed pathological people obtain unique positions of leadership and power, so is it surprising warfare remains so frequently occurring and grim?

Looked at it this way, Gabriel’s “psychopath pill” may not even be needed in warfare, because normal human beings are easily influenced, hypnotized, and swayed by the power of psychopaths who are already among us.

Sources:

Voices from our Conscience (out-of-print), P. Mari, Archangel & White Feather Press, 1995

No More Heroes; Madness and Psychiatry in War, Richard A. Gabriel, New York: Hill and Wang, 1987

Operation Enduring Valor, Dr. Richard A. Gabriel

Perfect Killer, Lewis Perdue, 2005, Virtual Tour

Richard A. Gabriel, Potomac Books Inc.

ABC News, US Army Says Sorry for Afghan Corpse Photos, Sally Sara, updated March 22, 2011

The Raw Story,Rolling Stone Publishes Graphic Photos and Videos from Notorious Afghan 'Kill Team, David Edwards, 3/28/2011

'Death Squad': Full Horror Emerges of how Rogue U.S. Brigade Murdered and Mutilated Innocent Afghan Civilians - and Kept their Body Parts as Trophies, Danial Bates and Mark Duell, updated March 29, 2011

Similar Articles by Same Author:

Curing Psychopathy: Healing the World?

Frost/Nixon: How to Deal with Psychopaths

Are Psychopaths Ill or Evil

From Paris with Love

Freelance Writer & Journalist, Artist & Poet, Star Rothe

Paula Marie Deubel - Published author/writer/journalist/poet I've always written under the pen name "P. Mari," an abbreviation of my full name. I have ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 1+1?

Comments

May 13, 2011 1:44 AM
Guest :
It makes sense to use psychopaths for war. They love to kill and they usually like to kill other males I say other males because most of the psychopaths are male.

Several of the men I work with have said that the war on terror will not be over until they kill ALL the al Qaeda and Taliban MALES. That is what war is usually about, males killing males but, well one more example, there was a car wreck a while ago near us where 5 men were killed. Both my brothers said at least it was all males.

Of course, as a woman, I am glad no women are killed but what is it about men that they so readily endorse the killing of other men simply because they are male? It does seem to be a male thing as I have read in history that often when one nation conquered another nation, they would kill ever male of the defeated nation. Sometimes it seems like psychopath and male have the same definition. My husband said I should be glad that they usually kill other males (and I am but I wonder why first of all many males like to kill and why other males most often? Of course, my husband said that this is just one of hundreds of reasons why women are superior to males and I certainly will not argue with him about that. One of the few things he is right about LOL
Jun 23, 2011 12:11 AM
Guest :
I am a MALE who can admit that women are superior to the males. We see this throughout nature also. For example, the mosquito shows the female is superior too. The male lives for only a week while the female lives twice as long. Another interesting thing is that it is only the female that bites but only the male buzzes. It is almost as if the male buzzes to make sure the female is able to bite because the male distracts the person bitten as they are looking for the mosquito that is buzzing while she bites him. Of course, this means the male is killed most often as the female slips away. Just one more of thousands of examples in nature where the male is expendable and often the males die earlier so that the females can live longer.

We can also see so many times in nature that the females can usually outperform the males in many of the things that species does. We certainly can see that women today are outperforming males in almost every area. I think the sooner we human males can accept and acknowledge that women are superior to us males the sooner we can accept women being in control of society and this would make the world a much better place. I am one male who thinks women should be in total control over every area because women are overwhelmingly superior to males
Jul 16, 2011 11:00 PM
Guest :
It looks like everyone here agrees women are superior to men and from what I read I have to agree with everything that was said.

I recently changed my mind about males being the superior sex because it seems there are too many things to show that. It would be interesting if someone wrote an article about why women are superior to men and list all the areas they are better in but I guess it would be too long. If they listed the areas men are better in, it would not be enough to write about so I guess you can add one more man to the number of men who finally realize women are the superior sex.


Paula, maybe you could you write about the many reasons women are superior to us males? Maybe more people would realize that women are the superior gender if more wrote about it.
Jul 21, 2011 11:31 PM
Guest :
There is a very good book that shows that women are superior to males. "The Natural Superiority of Women" The February 2000 edition of the American Psychiatric Association had a very interesting article regarding Montagu's "The Natural Superiority of Women" which at much as I hate to admit it, confirmes what many have said here, women are the superior gender.


"the fifth edition, Montagu (1999) says that since the fourth edition of the book appeared in 1992, "much new information bearing on the natural superiority of women has become available" and that "the new findings unexceptionally support and confirm the conclusions reached in this book." He says that he tried to leave the book essentially as it was written, but has brought it up to date with the latest findings and has also added new material.

Over the centuries, male scholars have pointed to the larger male brain, skeleton, height, and muscle mass as clear evidence of the male's superiority, as in the view "might makes right." However, in a paradigm shift that seeks to include the overall performance of the anatomy and physiology of male and female, Montagu believes women come out on top. Women apparently have a more powerful immunological system, which affords them greater protection against and better recovery from starvation, fatigue, shock, and illness. Also, although a woman's brain may be smaller than a man's, it has more neurons in the corpus callosum, which enables better coordination between hemispheres. Consequently, the female brain is more highly developed structurally and functionally, and it is capable of thinking more soundly and intuitively than the male brain, Montagu says. The end result is that women are more insightful and have greater stamina and longevity—or, in other words, women stand the test of time.

In spite of the book's provocative title, Montagu insists it is not his intention to inflate the status of one sex over the other, but rather to bring the sexes closer together. Montagu believes that if we are to achieve social equality, men must be convinced that women are superior. His desire is for a reconstructed American culture in which the male values of physical dominance, acquisition of material goods, and aggression give way to humane attributes and abilities. Women, being the truly superior beings they are, will of course not brag about their biological superiority over men, but will treat them kindly and gently"

Much more has been learned since 1999, the last update of this book and sad for us males to say, even more ways women are superior have been discovered.but maybe he is right when he said "men must be convinced that women are superior"

I am ready to throw in the towel and admit that women are superior and that males are inferior to women
4 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement